Australia walked away today with the ICC World Cup today.
Before the semifinals of the tournament, Harsha Bhogle, India’s No. 1 cricket commentator, made a statement that he thought India had peaked too early. He was shot down quickly by Ravi Shastri.
Today’s final was exactly as Harsha, )and I), had predicted.
Rohit, Virat and Rahul, played their roles. but Gil, Iyer, Jadeja and Suryakumar were exactly the disappointment that I knew would occur.
I was happy to see that even in a non-traditional cricketing state in India, Kerala, people had turned out to sit under the trees to watch the final, and this was beautifully covered by Manorama TV.
My grandfather, late K. C. Mammen Mappillai, would have been proud that when he translated the very first article I ever wrote, when I was just 9 years old (71 years ago), which he translated to Malayalam and had it published in the newspaper, has now resulted in Sanju Samson hitting the high spot in Indian Men’s Cricket, closely followed by Minnu Mani, in the Ladies game.
Minnu Mani
Minnu is the first Kerala lady player to play for India and was the leading wicket taker in the series against Bangladesh.Coming back to World Cup final, the brave decision to choose to field after winning the toss was credit to Pat Cummins.
Gil never got going. This was a clear sign of what lay ahead. Rohit and Virat played their roles well, but Rohit as captain, should have shown some more maturity.
The absolutely fantastic catch by Travis Head showed that the Australians were not going to roll over.
The Australians were throwing themselves everywhere, reducing 4s to 2s and ones.
Fielding was exceptional and as I have said earlier, it is the fielding that wins games.
With Rohit going, closely followed by Iyer, it was becoming clear that India was not going to reach the par score of 300.
Thi brilliant catch by Travis Hesd to send off Rohit showed the mood of the Australians. They were playing TO WIN.
The procession that followed with the absolutely outstanding team work of the Australians. meant that the Indians could not put a foot in the door.
Restricting the Indians to just 240 meant the Australians did not have a dagger over their heads and they could go about their work with a precision that they are renowned for.
No heroics were necessary and the confidence shown by Travis Head in his batting, which earned him the Player of the Match Award, was an example of cool composure.
I am sad that India lost, but I concur fully with Harsha Bhogle who said that the Indian side had not been exposed fully and, therefore, they were unprepared for a reversal of fortunes in any game.
I do not blame the Indian bowlers, as the pitch turned in character at the innings break. Even if they could bowl at their best, they were in the sights of clever Australian batting which had sufficient depth not to be rattled by a couple of reversals, exactly the opposite to the under-exposed Indian side.
In my humble opinion, Ravichandran Ashwin, who is one of the most well-read players in Indian history, should have been in this side. Not only would he have been an asset in the batting, he would have read the pitch and adjusted his bowling better than any of his colleagues
You may have on paper the best side in the world! However, knowledge was what was lacking in today's performance by India.
