Showing posts with label education. Show all posts
Showing posts with label education. Show all posts

Friday, November 10, 2023

Finnish Immigration Policy - Where is it going?


My 2001 report to the Finnish Sports Federation on tools for integration.

ThisYouTube video “The Full Story” by Johanna Kauppinen is worth watching. It handles a look at the new immigration policy.


Annikki and I will try, in a later blog, to put it into perspective of my 54 years as a foreigner of interaction with Finland.

There is much you can do in your personal life which will have  a long term impact on your acclimatisation, especially if you have children!

For instance, is putting children in an International School the correct answer?

Racism is rife in Finland. It is hidden and can be a shock if it hits you between the eyes. 

I faced it in England in 1963 and again when I moved to Finland in 1984. How did I cope with it? How have our chldrn faced it and coped wih it?

If you have any questons, do write to us to help you through the problems.

Tuesday, October 24, 2023

India and/or Bharat - Name controversy

A new discussion has started raging in my country of birth. What should be the name by which we should refer to it


(Picture taken from Times of India.)

I saw posts on Instagram and Twitter with persons suggesting one name was more relevant than the other.

Before going into the name for my country, let us look at the name of another country, Annikki’s country, called Finland which is also called Suomi. 


The people are referred to as Finns or in Finnish as Suomalainen. 


AI provided this answer as to the name of this 

country as per the Constitution.


The name of the country in the Finnish Constitution is the Republic of Finland, also known as Suomen tasavalta in Finnish.


AI also gave a response as to the historical name of this country:


The country Finland is commonly known by two names: Finland and Suomi. "Finland" is an foreign-language term for the country, which has been used internationally for many years. On the other hand, "Suomi" is the Finnish name for the country and is used by the native Finnish-speaking population.

 

The origin of the name "Suomi" dates back to ancient times when Finland was inhabited by Finnish tribes. The meaning of the word is not entirely clear, but it is believed to have originated from the Proto-Finnic term "suomaa," which means "swampland." This name likely reflects the country's landscape, featuring numerous lakes and forests.


The adoption of the name "Finland" in English came about through various historical and linguistic reasons. During the Middle Ages, the region was part of the Kingdom of Sweden, and the Swedish name for the area was "Finland." This name then became widely known internationally when Finland was a part of the Swedish Kingdom.


Later, when Finland was under Russian rule in the early 19th century, the Finnish language began to gain prominence and recognition as a distinct identity. As a result, the Finnish name "Suomi" became more commonly used among the Finnish-speaking population.


Both names, "Finland" and "Suomi," are now commonly used to refer to the country, depending on the language being spoken. "Finland" is the primary foreign name, while "Suomi" is the Finnish name.

Is there any controversy in having two names - each with its own importance!

Take look at the Indian Constitution:

“The Constitution of India begins by saying ‘India that is Bharat’, the Hindi version says ‘Bharat that is India’.


The name mentioned in the Tamil version of the Indian Constitution is பாரதம் (Pāratam), which is the Tamil transliteration of the Sanskrit word भारत (Bhārata). The Tamil version of the Constitution was adopted in 1956, and it has the same legal status as the English version.

The word பாரதம் (Pāratam) is used throughout the Tamil version of the Constitution to refer to the country of India.


The Malayalam version of the Indian Constitution refers to the name of India and Bharat as ഭാരതം (Bhāratam). This is the Malayalam transliteration of the Sanskrit word भारत (Bhārata).

The Malayalam version of the Constitution was adopted in 1956, and it has the same legal status as the English version. The word ഭാരതം (Bhāratam) is used throughout the Malayalam version of the Constitution to refer to the country of India. For example, Article 1 of the Malayalam version states:

ഭാരതം, അതായത് ഇന്ത്യ, സംസ്ഥാനങ്ങളുടെ യൂനിയനായിരിക്കും.

(Bhāratam, athāyat Intiya, saṃsthāngaḷuṭe yūniyanāyirikkum.)

Which translates to:

India, that is Bharat, shall be a Union of States.

The name ഭാരതം (Bhāratam) is also used in the Malayalam names of many government institutions and organizations, such as the ഭാരത സർക്കാർ (Bhāratha Sarkar; Government of India) and the ഭാരത തെരഞ്ഞെടുപ്പ് കമ്മീഷൻ (Bhāratha Tēraññjetuppu Kammīṣaṇ; Election Commission of India).

The use of the name ഭാരതം (Bhāratam) in the Malayalam version of the Constitution and in the names of government institutions and organizations reflects the long and rich history of Malayalam culture and language in India.

 In the Bengali version of the Indian Constitution, the name of India is "ভারত" (Bharat) and Bharat is also referred to as "ভারত গণরাজ্য" (Bharat Ganarajya).

When we wrote our book "The Titanic Called India" in 2015 we tackled this subject of names of cities at the start of our chapter on Bangalore.

We wrote:

Bengaluru:

A City in Self Immolation


The name Bangalore was officially changed to Bengaluru on the 1st of November 2015. 

 

Hundreds of Indian cities have had their names changed since India became independent in 1947. The latest round was the 11 cities in Karnataka State, of which Bengaluru was the largest.

 

They wondered why these cosmetic changes were done. 

 

It costs the country many crores to implement such a simple name change. As no one wants to oppose the mass mentality, and these sorts of changes, which have nothing to do with policies, development or growth, but are purely to get votes by pleasing an uneducated set of people run by useless emotions, this has become a national priority. 

 

It is an attempt to change history, because people do not appreciate history!

 

Bombay was changed to Mumbai, Madras to Chennai, Calcutta to Kolkota, Poona to Pune.

 

The question is who benefits from such changes! 

 

Nobody seems to care how much it costs as it appears they are not paying for it as it does not go out of their personal bank accounts. 

 

But someone is paying for it! It is everyone!

 

But then who cares?

 

Annikki said she did not like the new name. Jacob was indifferent. Since neither Annikki nor Jacob are taxpayers in India, their views do not matter. If this is what Bengaluruns liked, so be it! To hell with the cost!!!




Let us take look at this map of the subcontinent during Mahabharat times.







This video looks at the history of India every year.

It is also important to look at the oldest languages of the world and the oldest spoken language of the world as shown in this video.







Although Sanskrit and Tamil are the two oldest languages of 5000 years, the oldest spoken language is Tamil. Hindi and Urdu are relatively new languages.

There is no connection between the southern part of the subcontinet and the northern part in ancient Indian history. 

The Arayan culture is not native to India as Dravidian culture is. 

Hence the imposition of that era of history is totally disrespecting the indigenous Dravidian culture that prevailed here.

Also look at what is considered as the oldest spoken language in the world, which is Tamil. 

What respect is given to that part of our culture by choosing the name of Bharat for the country. 

So why not use the word of a living language and not a dead one? 

Pāratam!

The claim that India was derived from the colonial history has been debunked by a well researched article which linked the derivation of India from the name Indumathi. (The following was published in the Times of India.)

"Once upon a time, there was a princess called Indu (the moon) or Indumati (the full moon). Her brother was Bhoja, king of Vidarbha. She chose Aja, king of Ayodhya, as her husband. They had a child called Dasharatha. But then, one day, she died, startled by a flower that fell from heaven. Aja could not bear to live without her, and so died soon after, passing on the mantle of the throne to their young son. Dasharatha’s eldest son was Ram, born of the senior queen Kaushalya. His second son was Bharat born of his favourite queen Kaikeyi.

Kaikeyi tried to secure Dasharatha’s throne for Bharat using her cunning, but Bharat had too much integrity to accept it. He insisted Ram inherit the crown, as per the law. Ram established the legendary Ram-rajya, and ruled the land we now call India, named after his grandmother Indumati, and Bhaarat, named after his brother Bharat. These names remind us that Ram’s kingdom was full of women who were much loved by their husbands, and brothers who did not fight brothers over property."

What are the arguments being made for and against changing the name of India to Bharat?

The argument for changing the name of India to Bharat is primarily based on assumed the  historical and cultural reasons. Here are some key arguments quoted in favour of the change:


1. Historical and Cultural Continuity: Bharat is claimed to be the ancient Sanskrit name of India, with roots dating back to several millennia. Supporters argue that changing the name to Bharat would reflect the country's rich historical and cultural heritage, emphasizing its deep-rooted traditions and heritage.


2. National Identity: Renaming the country to Bharat is seen by some as a way to reinforce a sense of national identity among its citizens. By adopting the "indigenous" name, proponents argue that it will strengthen the unity and pride of the diverse Indian population.


3. Symbolic Representation: Advocates believe that the name Bharat carries important symbolism that aligns with the values and ethos of the nation. The name is supposedly associated with India's ancient Vedic civilization and signifies a greater connection to the country's timeless heritage.


4. Indian Languages and Vernacular: Bharat is widely used in various Indian languages, including Hindi, Marathi, and Bengali, among others, as the name for India. Supporters argue that adopting Bharat as the official name would eliminate the language bias associated with the “English” term "India."


However, there are also arguments against changing the name to Bharat. Here are some of the key counter arguments:


1. Historical and Global Recognition: The name India has been widely recognized and used for centuries in both historical contexts and global interactions. Changing the name to Bharat will lead to confusion or require significant effort and resources to update official documents, maps, treaties, and international agreements.


2. Linguistic Diversity: India is known for its linguistic diversity, with numerous languages and dialects spoken throughout the country. The name India has become a common unifying factor across different linguistic groups, allowing for ease of communication and identification among the diverse population.


3. Political and Administrative Challenges: Implementing a name change on a national level requires significant administrative efforts, including amending the Constitution, updating legal documents, changing the names of government bodies, and altering educational curricula. Such a process can be time-consuming, costly, and may face resistance from various stakeholders.


4. Prioritization of Other Issues: Critics argue that changing the name of the country to Bharat may divert attention and resources from more pressing socioeconomic and developmental issues that require immediate focus. They believe that the government's efforts should be concentrated on addressing these challenges instead of a symbolic name change.


Overall, the decision to change the name of India to Bharat involves weighing historical and assumed cultural heritage against practical considerations, administrative challenges, and the potential impact on national and international recognition.


It is interesting to see how Amitabh  Bachan introduced the Shillong Chamber Choir when they sang “Vande Mataram” on his tv program. 




Amitabh Bachan has tweeted more than once about changing the name from India to Bharat. Would he be singing "Proud to be a Bharatian" and delete his stand that it is "Proud to be an Indian”?


Secondly how much would Amitabh Bachan hand over to the exchequer from his "personal wealth" to change the name from India to Bharat.


This is the ultimate in political sycophancy, and not any stand on principles. 


Narendra Modi went on this tirade to change the name when the Opposition Alliance this year made I.N.D.I.A. their acronym for their stand against him.


All it shows is childishness.


Modi has a mass following of people who have no other claim to fame than other being blind Hindutva bhakths. 


These are same people who believe that Modi connected a pipe to the drain and used the "gas" from the drain to heat the tea for his "mythical" tea stand at a "mythical" railway station!


I wish Modi would give this appropriate high technology gas from drain technology to millions of his bhakths! 


It may save us a lot of oil and gas imports!


Is India to be governed by these blind bhakths or on the basis of historical and economic considerations.


The first estimate for the change of name is Rs. 12000 crores. This is unlikely be the final value, but will be manyfold times this estimate. 


Let Amitabh Bachan, Gautam Adani, the Ambani brothers, suggested by some as being Modi's financiers, foot this bill.


Why pass this cost on to the ordinary people of India?


With the large proportion of the Indian population living in gross poverty, can a country afford such a luxury. 


In what way will they benefit? 


Will it give them food, or shelter, clothing, education, safety, social security.


I recently addressed a leading newspaper editor on by when social security would become a feature in life in our country. 


The answer was unequivocal - NEVER!


Take a look at the leading world indicators between the two countries of my interest, Finland and India/Bharat/Pāratam.


The country should make it its first priority to make it the leading in at least a few of these indicators which would directly reflect the well being of the people.


Once that is done it is my personal opinion that people will not “time waste” on irrelevant exercises as changing the name of our country.


As a footnote it is interesting to who are the most wanting for India to give up its name! It is none other than Pakistan. :-)


The transboundary Indus river basin has a total area of 1.12 million km2 distributed between Pakistan (47 percent), India (39 percent), China (8 percent) and Afghanistan (6 percent). Pakistanis feel that they should have been given the name, India, as it is  the country through which the Indus River mainly runs through.


"The Islamic Republic of India also known as Pakistan"?


What would be the reaction of Modi and his bhakths (and Amitabh Bachman) to handing over the name "INDIA" to Pakistan on a golden platter? :-)

Tuesday, October 03, 2023

Education: The Great Equalizer

 

"Educated" blacksmith: The late K. Raghavan

When I was just 8 years old I went to Kottayam to stay the summer holidays with my maternal grandparents. 

Malayala Manorama was in the throes of being restarted after India obtained independence. A vindictive Dewan of Travancore, who had an aversion to Christians and anyone associated with the Indian freedom movement, had locked down the Malayala Manorama newspaper in 1938 and he had corrupted the justice system and imprisoned my grandfather on trumped up charges as he disliked journalists, (much like what is happening in India just today).

After coming out of prison and waiting for Indian Independence, K. C. Mammen Mappillai  restarted the newspaper.

He acquired a second hand rotary printing machine. There were no drawings or instructions, just packages containing all the parts of the press.

There was a young blacksmith who was also a car mechanic working for the newspaper. He used to repair the treadle presses when they broke down.

He had a small blacksmithery above the house kitchen where he would cast the lead letters for typesetting. As he allowed me to fan the fire with the bellows, I used to spend many hours with him.

One day, he was called by my grandfather who asked him whether he could put together a team of workers to set up the old rotary press. 

There was no hesitation from this young man, which spoke of great confidence.

He had no knowledge of engineering drawings, or any other training in any field of engineering.

He put together a group of similar youngsters and got to work. I watched, quite fascinated how he went about his work, opening each package and sorting  the parts one by one. 

Then they started putting the press together. Slowly the press started coming up, one side from the foundations and the other from the drive mechanisms. They worked feverishly and tirelessly, day and night, as it was a promise they made to my grandfather.

I went back to Bangalorc  and came back for our next  vacation. The press was almost ready and they wanted to start it up.

They considered me a mascot. Raghavan called me one afternoon and asked whether I would press the START button.

I pressed it but nothing happened. No one was disappointed. 

They got to work again and shortly I was asked to again perform the honours. 

This time this huge machine creaked and started to move to the cheers of the small group of workers.

Then it was a question of fine tuning and setting it up to run. Before my vacation was over, the machine was actually printing newspapers.

To my mind, that was the work of a highly educated individual, who in subsequent years earned the respect of printing engineers worldwide who came and set up the most complicated printing presses for the newspaper.  

The engineers held Raghavan in great awe.

Raghavan was not even permitted to retire by the newspaper and continued as an "Advisor".

This simple man, older to me by almost 9 years, always addressed me as “Sushilchayan” a term of respect in our Malayali system.

One day I will blog much more about this fascinating person.

Today there was a report in my INBOX that said that the country which was most educated was South Korea. Finland was ranked 29th  and India was near the bottom at 43rd out of 46 nations. 

The basis of judging this was by the number of people who had attained a tertiary degree.

List of most educated countries in the world: Know where India stands 

South Korea has the highest percentage of educated persons. 


Ratings from report:

    1. South Korea: 69%
    2. Canada: 67%
    3. Japan: 65%
    4. Ireland: 63%
    5. Russia: 62%
    6. Luxembourg: 60%
    7. Lithuania: 58%
    8. UK: 57%
    9. Netherlands: 56%
    10. Norway: 56%
    11. Australia: 56%
    12. Sweden: 52%
    13. Belgium: 51%
    14. Switzerland: 51%
    15. United States: 51%
    16. Spain: 50%
    17. France: 50%
    18. Denmark: 49%
    19. Slovenia: 47%
    20. Israel: 46%
    21. Latvia: 45%
    22. Greece: 45%
    23. Portugal: 44%
    24. New Zealand: 44%
    25. Estonia: 44%
    26. Austria: 43%
    27. Turkey: 41%
    28. Iceland: 41%
    29. Finland: 40%
    30. Poland: 40%
    31. Chile: 40%
    32. Slovakia: 39%
    33. Germany: 37%
    34. Czechia: 34%
    35. Colombia: 34%
    36. Hungary: 32%
    37. Costa Rica: 31%
    38. Italy: 29%
    39. Mexico: 27%
    40. China: 27%
    41. Saudi Arabia: 26%
    42. Brazil: 23%
    43. India: 20%
    44. Argentina: 19%
    45. Indonesia: 18%
    46. South Africa: 13%

In another recent report the best education system in the world is considered to be in Norway, followed by Finland, Singapore and South Korea.

I asked AI to prepare a short essay about its view on the best education systems.

Title: Exploring the World's Leading Education Systems 


Introduction:

Education plays a crucial role in shaping the future of any nation. Governments across the globe strive to enhance their education systems to provide their citizens with high-quality learning experiences. While there are several countries renowned for the excellence of their education systems, identifying the single country with the absolute best education system is subjective and depends on various factors. In this essay, we will explore some top contenders and shed light on their noteworthy aspects.


Norway:

Norway is often lauded for its exceptional education system. The country emphasizes inclusive practices that embrace diversity and provide equal opportunities for all students. Norwegian schools prioritize critical thinking, creativity, and student autonomy over rote memorization. Moreover, their curriculum is designed to foster skills such as problem-solving, teamwork, and communication. Consequently, Norway consistently ranks high in education-related metrics, promoting a culture of lifelong learning.


Finland:

Regarded as a pioneer in educational excellence, Finland has long been praised for its holistic approach to education. Finnish schools focus on nurturing students' overall well-being and personal growth, alongside academic achievement. Their curriculum places emphasis on playfulness, promoting a relaxed and enjoyable learning environment. Additionally, Finland places great importance on attracting and retaining highly qualified teachers, recognizing their role in driving educational success. This commitment has resulted in high teacher satisfaction and student outcomes.


Singapore:

Singapore, renowned for its high scores in international assessments, is often considered one of the world's leading education systems. The country prioritizes rigorous academic standards and a highly competitive curriculum. Singaporean schools emphasize mathematics, science, and technology, building a strong foundation for STEM-related fields. Moreover, the nation has a robust teacher training system, ensuring educators are equipped with the necessary skills to deliver quality education. Singapore's commitment to consistent improvement and innovation has contributed to its educational reputation.


South Korea:

South Korea is recognized for its strong educational achievements, with its students consistently ranking among the top performers in international assessments. The country emphasizes the importance of education and instills a strong work ethic in students from a young age. South Korean schools dedicate significant time to core subjects, particularly mathematics, science, and language. Additionally, their education system values discipline, dedication, and hard work, with students frequently engaging in additional tutoring and extracurricular activities.


Conclusion:

Identifying a single country with the absolute best education system is complex and subjective. However, Norway, Finland, Singapore, and South Korea represent nations that have achieved remarkable educational success. These countries prioritize various aspects, including inclusivity, teacher quality, holistic development, core subject mastery, and discipline. By examining the noteworthy aspects of these education systems, societies worldwide can gain valuable insights for enhancing their own education systems. Ultimately, the pursuit of educational excellence should be an ongoing endeavor, with a focus on creating environments that empower students to reach their full potential.

I then asked AI to write me an essay about education and whether achieving a tertiary degree was the criteria to define the education status of a nation.


Here is the interesting reply I received from AI

which fits quite well with Annikki and my practical experience:


Title: Exploring the Concept of Education: Beyond Tertiary Degrees


Introduction:

Education is a multifaceted term that goes beyond the mere acquisition of a tertiary degree. It encompasses a broader range of experiences, knowledge, and skills gained through formal, non-formal, and informal means. This essay aims to delve into the true essence of education and illustrate that its definition exceeds the boundaries of obtaining a tertiary degree.


Understanding Education:

At its core, education can be defined as the process of acquiring knowledge, skills, values, and understanding through various forms of learning. It involves both formal education, obtained through institutions like schools and universities, and informal education, which can be attained through real-life experiences, interactions, and self-study. Education equips individuals with the ability to think critically, solve problems, communicate effectively, and adapt to a rapidly changing world.


A Broader Scope:

While obtaining a tertiary degree is undoubtedly an important aspect of education, it would be too narrow to confine the entire concept to this single accomplishment. Education encompasses a wide array of experiences and opportunities that foster personal and intellectual growth, beyond the boundaries of academic achievement. For instance, individuals can acquire knowledge and skills through vocational training, apprenticeships, or workshops that equip them with valuable expertise in various fields.


Non-formal Education:

Non-formal education plays a significant role in shaping individuals' lives, even though it may not necessarily lead to a tertiary degree. This category includes community-based programs, professional development courses, online learning platforms, and workshops. Non-formal education provides individuals with learning opportunities to acquire skills, gain new perspectives, and expand their knowledge outside the traditional academic setting. It enables lifelong learning, fostering personal and professional growth on an ongoing basis.


Informal Education:

Informal education is an indispensable part of one's learning journey, often occurring naturally within everyday life experiences. It includes learning through observation, interaction, trial-and-error, and self-reflection. Informal education enables individuals to acquire practical skills, socialize, learn cultural norms, and develop valuable life skills that may not be achieved through formal education alone. In many cases, informal education complements or even surpasses the knowledge gained through formal channels.


The Purpose of Education:

Education serves a broader purpose beyond the acquisition of factual knowledge or qualifications. It fosters personal development, empowers individuals, and promotes social cohesion. The goal of education is to nurture critical thinking, enhance problem-solving abilities, shape ethical values, and cultivate well-rounded individuals capable of contributing positively to society. Education equips individuals with a sense of agency, enabling them to make informed decisions, adapt to changing circumstances, and engage actively as global citizens.


Conclusion:

In conclusion, education is a far-reaching concept that should not be limited to the sole acquisition of a tertiary degree. Education encompasses formal, non-formal, and informal learning experiences that empower individuals to grow intellectually, acquire practical skills, and develop a wide range of competencies. While a tertiary degree holds its significance, it is only one aspect of the broader landscape of education. By recognizing and valuing various forms of education, we can promote lifelong learning, personal growth, and societal development.

Malayala Manorama launched its Manorama Year Book in 1959.


1984 Year Book which I brought to Finland with me and formed the basis of many lectures I gave about India.

The 2008 year book I recently gifted to a young Indian boy in Oulu who has a bent for curiosity.


Another year I gave the Year Book to a young Finnish girl in Oulu on her graduation. I was thanked profusely for it.


Many have asked me how I acquired such a broad General Knowledge. 


When the first edition of the Year Book was being prepared, my uncle, the Chief Editor of the Malayala Manorama, set up a offer where he offered me Rupee 1 for every mistake I could find in the Year Book. 


Rupee 1 was a huge sum those days for a 16 year old.


I meticulously read the Year Book, cover to cover, and earned a tidy sum! 


That proof reading exercise paid me well then and later in my personal and professional life.


I am not a very clever individual but certain key steps in my life have paid me lavishly!


(I will blog a few other interesting helpful tips for life in a later blog!)


My friend and hero, Raghavan, is my model of an educated human being. No South Korean, Norwegian, Finn or Singaporean, could hold a candle to my Raghavan!


Raghavan did not even have a basic education.